Many people, especially those in rural or remote areas or those seeking abortions beyond 20 weeks of pregnancy, have trouble finding nearby abortion services. This means they may have to travel long distances, which causes delays in getting care and adds extra costs. Most abortion clinics are in big cities, especially those providing later pregnancy care, and some provinces and territories only have a few clinics and hospitals that offer abortion services. Further, not all provinces and territories have billing codes for medical abortion, which can de-incentivize physicians from providing it.
Even though abortion is a medical procedure covered by provincial and territorial health insurance plans (with exceptions in New Brunswick), people might still have to pay for transportation, accommodation, and time off work to access abortion. In Ontario, many providers charge overhead or administrative fees. For those who do not have provincial insurance, the cost of an abortion can be very expensive. In addition to procedure and medication costs, hospitals may add high facility fees.
Abortion is a normal health care procedure, but negative social judgment and discrimination can still prevent people from seeking care.2 This includes negative attitudes from healthcare providers, communities, and even family and friends.
Abortion is a common procedure, yet medical and nursing schools do not dedicate sufficient resources and time to training and educating healthcare professionals about it. This can result in delays, misinformation, ineffective referrals, and inadequate care.
Some provinces and territories have restrictions that create barriers to care, while many others do not have the necessary infrastructure to improve abortion access.
Anti-abortion movements, organizations, and individuals may use disinformation campaigns, political lobbying, and protesting and harassment as part of their tactics to convince people to not have an abortion as well as to restrict access. Their efforts, which often centre on misinformation/disinformation and reinforcing negative judgment about abortion, can delay or interfere with access to abortion and prevent people from making informed reproductive health decisions. Anti-choice activities can negatively impact abortion providers as well, with nearly one in five providers having seriously considered changing the care they provide because of experiences or fear of harassment.3
CPCs are anti-abortion organizations that present themselves as clinics or counselling centres. Many of them spread false or misleading information about abortion and operate with the goal of dissuading people from getting abortions. Many also provide post-abortion counselling services that routinely diagnose clients with “post abortion stress disorder,” use shaming and stigmatizing language, and fail to disclose religious affiliations.4 CPCs are not regulated in Canada, and 93% are registered charities. CPCs may prevent people from making informed decisions, delay access to abortion care as well as other reproductive health care services such as prenatal care,5 and contribute to abortion stigma and shame.6
Before colonization, many Indigenous communities used traditional medicines to prevent or end pregnancies. Today, Indigenous peoples, especially those living in remote or rural areas, encounter significant obstacles in accessing abortion and other healthcare services. These challenges stem largely from the historical and contemporary impacts of colonialism, which has led to anti-Indigenous racism within the healthcare system. Indigenous peoples face widespread and deep-rooted barriers, such as mistreatment by healthcare providers, including instances of forced sterilization and denial of critical care. State policing, like the use of birth alerts, can also affect Indigenous peoples’ sense of safety when seeking reproductive healthcare. Additionally, intergenerational trauma can have a lasting impact on their health outcomes. All of these factors can make it difficult for Indigenous individuals to access the reproductive healthcare they need.7
Similarly, systemic racism can create significant barriers to accessing healthcare for Black people and people of colour. These barriers include but are not limited to living in areas with less health care infrastructures, health disparities leading to the need for more specialized care, mistreatment by healthcare providers, language and cultural barriers, experiences of bias and discrimination in the health care system, and the lack of culturally-competent care.
Access to healthcare and health outcomes are impacted by people’s financial circumstances. Poverty can lead to insidious barriers even when services are “free.” For example, people might not be able to afford the costs of transportation, accommodation, and time off work to get to an abortion appointment, especially if they live far from an abortion provider. Studies show that people who live in well-resourced parts of Canada have better access to family medicine than people who live in areas that are under-resourced, which can impact how far someone might need to travel for care. People experiencing homelessness lack access to basic resources like food, shelter, and transportation, making it difficult to get preventative care and to seek urgent care, including abortion. They may also experience mistreatment in the health care system, and might not have government issued ID, a support network, or easy access to information.
IPV can lead to negative effects on reproductive health and make it hard for people to make their own medical decisions. It can cause problems like difficulty traveling to appointments, being coerced or forced into reproductive choices, fear of retaliation, limited access to information, to privacy, and financial reliance on the abuser.9
Young people might encounter extra challenges when trying to access abortion services. These can include a shortage of youth-friendly services, privacy issues, trouble getting identification documents, a lack of information and support, judgments or stereotypes from healthcare providers, and difficulties navigating the healthcare system.10
People who identify as Two-Spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other non-binary identities may encounter obstacles when trying to access abortion services. Some healthcare providers might not be understanding or supportive of their identities and experiences, leading to unwelcoming environments where 2SLGBTQ+ individuals feel judged, dismissed, invisible, or discriminated against. As a result, they may face additional challenges in finding abortion services that are competent and affirming of their unique needs and identities.11
Undocumented people, newcomers, and refugees encounter extra challenges when trying to access abortion care in Canada. Some experience language barriers because they are not fluent in English or French, which can make it difficult to communicate with healthcare providers. If they don't have health insurance, the cost of abortion care can be prohibitive. Undocumented individuals may fear that seeking healthcare services could lead to their immigration status being exposed, resulting in potential consequences from the authorities. They may not be familiar with how the healthcare system works in Canada and may have limited access to information about what is available to them.
Lack of accessible care and negative judgments or attitudes about disabled people can make access to abortion harder for them. Women with disabilities, in particular, experience sexual and gender-based violence at alarming rates, leading to a higher likelihood of unwanted pregnancies and need for abortions.12 They may also face higher healthcare costs because of transportation or attendant needs, or have to attend appointments in clinics that are not accessible. Disabled individuals are also at a higher risk of facing serious complications during pregnancy and childbirth,13 increasing the importance of timely access to abortion services.
Fat people are less likely to access health care and are less likely to receive evidence-based and bias-free health care when they do because of weight stigma and fatphobia.14 Additionally, abortion clinics often have rules that exclude people with higher BMIs* from receiving services. Consequently, fat people can be turned away and referred to hospitals.15 16
Access to sexual and reproductive health information is severely limited in prisons. Incarcerated people experience complex health histories and high needs, alongside restrictions to health information and services.17 Because of low access to contraceptives, people in prison are more likely to experience unplanned pregnancy and abortion than the general population.18 Barriers to abortion access include restrictive security, staffing shortages that prevent the arrangement of escorts for off-site care, policies and practices, and high out-of-pocket costs.19 Use of medication abortion medication is challenging in prisons, due to lack of menstrual supplies, unhygienic conditions, and lack of privacy.20 Incarcerated people in northern parts of Ontario, British Columbia, and Alberta are furthest from abortion care.21
While specialized training for providing medication abortion is not needed, there is training available through the National Abortion Federation of Canada. For procedural abortion training, research suggests that many obstetrics and gynecology residents, as well as the vast majority of family medicine residents, do not have the opportunity to train to competence in first trimester abortion care.
The willingness of providers to participate from all departments in a hospital or clinic that would need to be involved in abortion care. For example, nursing and anesthesia departments.
Formal limits may include gestational age limits and the restriction of abortion care to cases where there are fetal or maternal health indications. These restrictions may be imposed by administrators arbitrarily, and do not reflect any existing legislation. Informal limits may include allocation of hospital privileges and operating room time, or lack thereof.
It can be difficult for residents trained in procedural abortion to maintain their skills after graduation. This is especially true in rural areas, where procedure volumes may be low due to the small size of the surrounding population.
In New Brunswick, the provincial government will only cover the cost of abortion care if this care is provided by a hospital. People who require care from a free-standing clinic have to pay out of pocket.
Abortion is stigmatized, which can lead to feelings of shame or guilt for those who are seeking abortion care. This can be made worse by feeling dismissed, judged, and mistreated by health care providers. Internalized negative judgements about abortion and discrimination from others can have critical impacts on mental health and can make it difficult for individuals to seek out the care they need or to enlist support from their families or communities.
For people who have been through traumatic experiences related to sexual violence or loss of bodily autonomy, the process of seeking and getting abortion care can bring back painful feelings. The trauma from sexual violence can create a heightened sense of fear and anxiety, making the decision-making process more challenging. It may lead to increased apprehension about the abortion procedure itself or about interacting with healthcare providers in some cases, especially because of vaginal exams and/or internal procedures.
Individuals who lack support from friends, family members, or healthcare providers may experience increased hardship and suffering while trying to get abortion care. Without emotional support in the decision-making process, people may feel alone, abnormal, or have difficulty considering all of their options. Lack of practical support may mean not having a ride to their abortion appointment, not having someone who can help with childcare, or not being able to sufficiently rest in the recovery period.
When individuals are turned away by primary care providers, or they live in areas with few abortion providers, it can be difficult to determine if abortion is available at all. This can cause significant stress and anxiety, which worsens emotional difficulties in decision-making.
Most abortions take place in community-based clinics, which are equipped for caring for able-bodied individuals. Clinics that are regulated by external bodies like Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons are required to refer people with some pre-existing health conditions to hospital settings. When individuals have a pre-existing health condition, including reduced mobility and significant mental illness; an elevated Body Mass Index*; or are taking certain medications, their abortion may not be accommodated and they may need to go to hospital. This can increase their wait times, and may mean that people need to travel farther to get their abortion.
Under the Canadian Medical Association (CMA)’s Code of Ethics and Professionalism, physicians must inform patients if their “moral commitments” may influence the care they provide. However, the Code of Ethics does not direct physicians to provide a referral to another provider or clinic if they refuse to provide care due to personal beliefs.
All physicians are regulated by provincial and territorial Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons, some of which refer to or adapt the CMA Code of Ethics and Professionalism27. However, some Colleges have their own separate policies on “conscientious objection.” Some policies oblige physicians to refer patients to resources or providers who can give them information about the service they are seeking. Only Ontario and Nova Scotia policies direct physicians to provide a timely referral to another provider or clinic that can provide the service in cases of belief-based care denial.
Nurse practitioners can prescribe medication abortion in Canada. Nurse practitioners are regulated by provincial and territorial nursing Colleges, most of which have adapted or adopted the Canadian Nursing Association’s (CNA) Code of Ethics for Registered Nurses (2017). The Code of Ethics states that nurses are to notify their employers or the patient receiving care in advance so that alternative arrangements can be made in cases of conscientious objection. Detailed information about belief-based care denial for nurse practitioners in each province and territory can be found on their respective pages.
In Canada, the majority of abortions happen in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy.28 That said, ensuring access to abortion care after the first trimester is crucial for advancing reproductive health equity. Many barriers to abortion access can prevent a person from accessing care earlier in their pregnancy. Delays can be caused by:
People who are experiencing homelessness, severe drug addiction, who are undocumented or uninsured, or who face constant emergencies because of single parenthood, poverty, or family violence are also all more likely to have difficulty accessing timely care. People should not be denied their right to make informed and autonomous reproductive choices because of the stage of pregnancy, especially since those who have been delayed are often in vulnerable and precarious circumstances. However, these are the people who are most often denied their right to abortion and bodily autonomy when access to abortion services after the first trimester is limited.
Because of limitations to residents of certain regions, as well as overwhelming demand while being severely under-resourced, there is low availability of abortion care after 20 weeks in Canada. This increases the likelihood that those who are already vulnerable and have less resources will face increasingly complex logistical issues, more out-of-pocket expenses, farther travel distances, and longer wait-times. This in turn results in delays which increase the likelihood of being denied an abortion and therefore, being forced to carry an unwanted pregnancy to term.
In recent years, a number of hospitals in Canada have started to offer abortion services after 24 weeks. Prior to this, people in Canada had to travel to the United States to access services after that functional gestational time.
Every year, it is estimated that hundreds of people travel across the border to access services that are unavailable in Canada despite being covered by universal healthcare.29 Accessing care in the United States is still the most accessible option for many people seeking abortions over 24 weeks, though the Dobbs decision that reversed Roe v. Wade and the subsequent banning or severe restriction of abortion in over half the states has overwhelmed the points of services where Canadians travel to for care.
While provinces are required to cover the procedure costs of all medically necessary services, including abortion care, delivered outside of Canada, not all provinces have the infrastructure and processes necessary to do so. Traveling outside of Canada to access care is often limited to those with the means and ability to travel. In practical terms, this excludes undocumented people or migrants without the authorization to travel, those needing visas, people with severe mental illnesses, those who have criminal charges, many people needing to carry methadone or with severe addiction, youth, people in abusive relationships, and other vulnerable individuals.
When a person isn’t able to access an abortion that they want and need, they become more likely to experience worse financial, health, and family outcomes.30 These outcomes have been well-documented in the Turnaway study. A person who is denied an abortion is at higher risk of:
The negative impacts of abortion denial also affect families and communities. Children born as a result of abortion denial, as well as any existing siblings they have, experience worse child development and financial outcomes.
Being able to access abortion is crucial to the health and wellbeing of individuals, their families, and their communities.
1 Sethna, C., & Doull, M. (2013). Spatial disparities and travel to freestanding abortion clinics in Canada. Women’s Studies International Forum, 38, 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2013.02.001
2 Sorhaindo, A. M., & Lavelanet, A. F. (2022). Why does abortion stigma matter? A scoping review and hybrid analysis of qualitative evidence illustrating the role of stigma in the quality of abortion care. Social science & medicine (1982), 311, 115271. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115271
3 Ennis, M., Renner, R. M., Olure, B., Norman, W. V., Begun, S., Martin, L., Harris, L. H., Kean, L., Seewald, M., & Munro, S. (2023). Experience of stigma and harassment among respondents to the 2019 Canadian abortion provider survey. Contraception, 124, 110083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110083
4 LaRoche, K. J., & Foster, A. M. (2015). Toll free but not judgment free: evaluating postabortion support services in Ontario. Contraception, 92(5), 469–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2015.08.003
5 Rudrum, S. (2022). Student Encounters with a Campus Crisis Pregnancy Centre: Choice, Reproductive Justice and Sexual and Reproductive Health Supports. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 47(1). https://doi.org/10.29173/cjs29754
6 LaRoche, K. J., & Foster, A. M. (2015). Toll free but not judgment free: evaluating postabortion support services in Ontario. Contraception, 92(5), 469–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2015.08.003
7 Bombay, A., Matheson, K., & Anisman, H. (2009). Intergenerational trauma: Convergence of multiple processes among First Nations peoples in Canada. International Journal of Indigenous Health, 5(3), 6-47.
8 Ibid
9 Silverman, J. G., & Raj, A. (2014). Intimate Partner Violence and Reproductive Coercion: Global Barriers to Women’s Reproductive control. PLOS Medicine, 11(9), e1001723. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001723
10 Assifi, A. R., Kang, M., Sullivan, E. A., & Dawson, A. J. (2020). Abortion care pathways and service provision for adolescents in high-income countries: A qualitative synthesis of the evidence. PloS one, 15(11), e0242015. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242015
11 The Health of LGBTQIA2 Communities in Canada: Report of the Standing Committee on Health. (2019). In House of Commons of Canada.
12 Access for Everybody: Disability inclusion in abortion and contraceptive care. (2018). Ipas. https://www.ipas.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/AEDIOE18-AccesForEveryone.pdf
13 Gleason, J. L., Grewal, J., Chen, Z., Cernich, A. N., & Grantz, K. L. (2021). Risk of adverse maternal outcomes in pregnant women with disabilities. JAMA Network Open, 4(12), e2138414. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.38414
14 Lee, J., & Pausé, C. (2016). Stigma in practice: Barriers to health for fat women. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02063
15 A Reflection on BMI Limits. (2021). Choice in Health Clinic. https://choiceinhealth.ca/blog/a-reflection-on-bmi-limits
16 CityNews. (2021, November 22). https://montreal.citynews.ca/2021/11/22/montreal-abortion-fat-shamed/
17 Paynter, M. J., & Norman, W. V. (2022). The Intersection of Abortion and Criminalization: Abortion Access for People in Prisons. Seminars in reproductive medicine, 40(5-06), 264–267. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1758481
18 Paynter, M., Hernández, P. P., Heggie, C., McKibbon, S., & Munro, S. (2023). Abortion and contraception for incarcerated people: A scoping review. PLOS ONE, 18(3), e0281481. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281481
19 Ibid
20 Procedural Abortion Care for People in Prison in Canada. (n.d.). Wellness Within. https://caps-cpca.ubc.ca/AnnokiUploadAuth.php/1/16/Procedural_Abortion_Care_Guidebook.pdf
21 Paynter, M., & Heggie, C. (2023). Identifying abortion access barriers and facilitators for people in prison in Canada. 45(5): 364. https://doi-org.ezproxy.lib.torontomu.ca/10.1016/j.jogc.2023.03.077
22 Stern, C. (2021, May 8). Why BMI is a flawed health standard, especially for people of color. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/wellness/healthy-bmi-obesity-race-/2021/05/04/655390f0-ad0d-11eb-acd3-24b44a57093a_story.html
23 Gordon, A. (2021, December 12). The bizarre and racist history of the BMI - elemental. Medium. https://elemental.medium.com/the-bizarre-and-racist-history-of-the-bmi-7d8dc2aa33bb
24 Mishra, K., & Floegel-Shetty, A. (2023). What’s wrong with overreliance on BMI? AMA Journal of Ethics, 25(7), E469-471. https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2023.469
25 Tomiyama, A. J., Hunger, J. M., Nguyen-Cuu, J., & Wells, C. (2016). Misclassification of cardiometabolic health when using body mass index categories in NHANES 2005–2012. International Journal of Obesity, 40(5), 883–886. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2016.17
26 Stern, C. (2021, May 8). Why BMI is a flawed health standard, especially for people of color. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/wellness/healthy-bmi-obesity-race-/2021/05/04/655390f0-ad0d-11eb-acd3-24b44a57093a_story.html
27 Canadian Policies and Laws on “Conscientious Objection” in Health Care. (2023). In Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada. https://www.arcc-cdac.ca/media/position-papers/95-appendix-policies-conscientious-objection-healthcare.pdf
28 Induced Abortions Reported in Canada in 2021. (2023). Canadian Institute for Health Information. https://www.cihi.ca/sites/default/files/document/induced-abortions-reported-in-canada-2021-update-data-tables-en.xlsx
29 Connolly, A., & Browne, R. (2019, May 28). How the wave of U.S. restrictions will affect Canadian women sent there for abortions - National | Globalnews.ca. Global News. https://globalnews.ca/news/4354376/donald-trump-abortion-rights-canada-access/
30 The Turnaway Study. (n.d.). ANSIRH. https://www.ansirh.org/research/ongoing/turnaway-study